Whereas audio transcripts had been launched in Oct. 2, juror deliberations and prosecutor suggestions weren’t shared. Calls to first release the grand jury transcripts adopted the Sept. 23 announcement that no expenses can be pursued in opposition to the officers concerned within the case.


Final month Cameron claimed that grand jurors agreed that the actions of the officers concerned within the incident had been “justified.” Weeks later a spokesperson for Cameron acknowledged that prosecutors by no means beneficial expenses in opposition to the officers to the grand jury. Moreover, an nameless juror expressed Tuesday that Cameron’s model of the trial was unfaithful and that the jury was not given the possibility to indict any officer for murder.

“The grand jury did not agree that sure actions had been justified nor did it determine the indictment must be the one expenses within the Breonna Taylor case,” the juror, recognized as “Grand Juror #1” by lawyer Kevin Glogower, said. “The grand jury was not given the chance to deliberate on these [other] expenses and deliberated solely on what was introduced to them.” They added: “I can’t communicate for different jurors, however I can assist the reality be informed.”

In accordance with the juror’s assertion, the grand jury was solely requested to think about three wanton endearment expenses in opposition to police detective Brett Hankison who fired his gun into the neighboring condominium. “Questions had been requested about further expenses and the grand jury was informed there could be none as a result of the prosecutors did not really feel they may make them stick.” In accordance with NBC Information, one other juror represented by Glogower issued a separate assertion that stated they had been “happy” with the choose’s order to launch the information and “can be discussing attainable subsequent steps with counsel.”

Although Cameron disagreed with the choose’s resolution to launch the information, he stated he wouldn’t attraction it. Regardless of his recognized lies, he remained assured that he labored effectively. “As Particular Prosecutor, it was my resolution to ask for an indictment on expenses that could possibly be confirmed underneath Kentucky regulation,” he stated in a statement posted to Twitter. “Indictments obtained within the absence of adequate proof underneath the regulation don’t rise up and are usually not basically honest to anybody. I stay assured in our presentation to the Grand Jury, and I stand by the crew of legal professionals and investigators who devoted months of labor to this case.”

In response to the juror statements, attorneys for the Taylor household are calling for a brand new impartial prosecutor to look into the case. “We now know what we suspected: Legal professional Basic Daniel Cameron took the choice out of the grand jury’s palms,” legal professionals Ben Crump, Sam Aguiar, and Lonita Baker said in a statement on Tuesday.

“It’s a despicable miscarriage of justice that’s disrespectful of the lifetime of Breonna Taylor that AG Cameron white washed what his workplace introduced to the grand jury,” the attorneys stated. “This failure rests squarely on the shoulders of Daniel Cameron.”