Disney sued over Toy Story 4 Evel Knievel ‘knock-off’


Archive photo of Evel Knievel circa 1976Picture copyright
Getty Photos

Picture caption

Evel Knievel grew to become an iconic determine of the Nineteen Seventies due to his daredevil stunts

The son of famed Nineteen Seventies stuntman Evel Knievel is suing Disney and Pixar over the daredevil character Duke Caboom who options in Toy Story 4.

Kelly Knievel has accused the film giants of financially gaining from a personality that they had primarily based on his father with out searching for permission.

“Evel Knievel didn’t thrill hundreds of thousands, break his bones and spill his blood simply so Disney might make a bunch of cash,” he stated.

Disney denies the allegations.

A spokesperson for Walt Disney Co stated the corporate would defend itself vigorously towards what it known as the meritless claims, the Related Press reviews.

Montana-born Evel Knievel – actual title Robert Craig Knievel Jnr – was famend for his breath-taking motorcycle stunts in the course of the Nineteen Sixties and Nineteen Seventies.

He famously jumped over the Caesars Palace fountain in Las Vegas and 13 buses at Wembley Stadium in London, and used a rocket-powered bike to try to cross Snake River Canyon in Idaho.

Many of those makes an attempt resulted in crashes, however he stated claims that he had damaged each bone in his physique throughout his profession had been overblown.

Media playback is unsupported in your gadget

Media captionEvel Knievel’s son Kelly Knievel talks about his try to leap over 13 buses at Wembley Stadium

Duke Caboom – voiced by Keanu Reeves in Toy Story 4 – is described by Disney-owned Pixar as a “1970s toy based on Canada’s greatest daredevil and stuntman” who “has confidence and swagger” however “has by no means been capable of do the stunts as marketed by his personal toy industrial”.

Kelly Knievel, whose Las Vegas-based Okay and Okay Promotions filed the federal trademark lawsuit, has had publicity rights to Evel Knievel since 1978 and is searching for damages totalling greater than $300,000 (£236,000) on expenses of false endorsement and unjust enrichment.

The lawsuit alleges similarities within the look of Knievel and the Caboom character, and says a propelled stunt toy offered to market the film was similar to one in all Evel Knievel launched in 1973 and lately re-released. The Caboom character was additionally marketed as a part of a McDonald’s “Joyful Meal” promotion.

The criticism additionally accuses Disney of getting “expressly instructed forged members to keep away from drawing any public affiliation between Duke Caboom and Evel Knievel”, however added that the connection was apparent to observers.

“It is obvious Duke Caboom is a knock off of Evel Knievel,” K&K said in response to Disney’s response to the lawsuit. “I do not see a giant lengthy line of Disney executives able to get on a bike and leap 13 buses, nor do I keep in mind any Canadian daredevils from the 70s.

“Whereas we notice that Disney makes use of their Mickey Mouse attorneys to aggressively shield Disney mental property, they didn’t search permission to make use of Evel Knievel at any time.”