Mondaire Jones at The Nation writes about what’s at stake for voting rights:
The passage of the Voting Rights Act was a hard-won victory many years within the making. Blood was shed. However in the long run, my grandparents and tens of millions of others secured their proper to vote, and within a decade, elected Black candidates to public workplace at a price not seen because the daybreak of Reconstruction.
Almost 60 years later, Decide Amy Coney Barrett’s affirmation threatens to return Black folks to an period that our grandparents had decreased to reminiscence. Jim Crow will likely be reborn, unraveling democracy as we all know it. This isn’t hyperbole. Barrett’s file as a decide on the US Court docket of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit makes this clear. In a single resolution, she supported “virtue-based restrictions” on voting. In her view, voting just isn’t a basic proper assured to each citizen of this nation; it’s a privilege that states can revoke after they see match. This harkens again to the “morals” tests Southern states as soon as deployed to disenfranchise Black voters.
Extra from Dana Milbank at The Washington Submit, who argues the strain is now on Chief Justice John Roberts:
Whether or not the courtroom regains its independence or cements itself as a 3rd partisan department of presidency is now largely as much as Chief Justice John Roberts. If he doesn’t act, and quick, to mitigate the courtroom’s politicization, Democrats will likely be totally justified in increasing the courtroom’s membership to revive steadiness — and certainly will face a public outcry in the event that they don’t. […]
If the chief justice needs to revive dignity to the Roberts Court docket, it’s clear sufficient what must be executed:
He can lean closely on Barrett to recuse herself from any case arising from the presidential election subsequent week.
He can use his affect to ensure the courtroom upholds the Reasonably priced Care Act after it hears arguments subsequent month — not a legalistic punt on technical issues of “severability” however a ruling that places an finish to the fixed assaults on Obamacare.
However Seung Min Kim argues that the ball can be within the Democrats’ courtroom, with the flexibility to now play by the GOP’s energy guidelines ought to they retake the Senate:
the pipeline of conservative judges and the fast-track procedures Republicans have used to verify them give a possible President Joe Biden and a Democratic-led Senate a tough playbook to attempt to set up their very own stream of liberal nominees. […]
A Biden White Home and a Democratic-controlled Senate might actually benefit from the ground modifications by with the ability to verify Supreme Court docket picks with a easy majority and course of district courtroom nominees extra rapidly on the ground, ought to they prioritize the judiciary. […]
“No,” mentioned Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), when requested whether or not Democrats ought to supply deference to Republican home-state senators if they don’t log off on circuit courtroom nominees from a Biden administration. “The foundations have modified. Do I look silly to you?”
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), one other Judiciary Committee member, additionally harassed that he believes Democrats “should play full hardball” on judges.
In the meantime, on the pandemic, Paul Krugman analyzes the White Home’s white flag of give up:
That is, in any case, Donald Trump. Additionally, we’ve seen this mixture of denial, declared helplessness and conspiracy theorizing earlier than: Trump and firm are following the identical technique on Covid-19 that the precise has lengthy adopted on local weather change. […]
Was there ever an opportunity that Trump would take the pandemic critically? In all probability not. In any case, he has at all times been a die-hard, conspiracy-theorizing denier of local weather change, and his coronavirus response has come straight out of the climate-denier playbook.
In any case, we will predict with excessive accuracy what he’ll do if the polls are improper, and he wins a second time period. He’ll do nothing in any respect to struggle the pandemic; he’ll, nonetheless, attempt to suppress the reality about what’s occurring. And plenty of, many extra Individuals will die.
The Washington Post explains how a accountable administration might deal with the pandemic:
At the least 225,000 Americans have died, nevertheless it doesn’t must be this fashion. Though optimism about an efficient vaccine or remedy is warranted, nobody could be certain when both will likely be prepared. Till then, virus scorching spots want a speedy response, together with non permanent shutdowns the place essential to sluggish transmission. A nationwide masks mandate would assist immensely. Shortages in private protecting gear should be alleviated. As soon as the raging neighborhood unfold is decreased, an enormous drive to check, hint and isolate the sick might start to maintain infections at a low stage. All of this can require management — which is one other approach of claiming it should require a special president.
Talking of accountable administrations, former President Barack Obama previews a portion of his e-book at The New Yorker. It’s a should learn:
I’d seen him in March, when he’d made a shock look at a White Home convention we held to get the ball rolling on universal-health-care laws. Teddy’s stroll was unsteady that day; his swimsuit draped loosely on him in any case the burden he’d misplaced, and regardless of his cheerful demeanor his pinched, cloudy eyes confirmed the pressure it took simply to carry himself upright. And but he’d insisted on coming anyway, as a result of thirty-five years earlier the reason for getting everybody first rate, inexpensive well being care had develop into private for him. His son Teddy, Jr., had been identified with a bone most cancers that led to a leg amputation on the age of twelve. Whereas on the hospital, Teddy had come to know different dad and mom whose youngsters had been simply as unwell however who had no concept how they’d pay the mounting medical payments. Then and there, he had vowed to do one thing to vary that.